Alicia Marie Englert became the center of a legal and ethical storm in 2014 after a newborn baby was found alive in a trash can in Kearns, Utah. The 23-year-old was arrested and charged with first-degree felony attempted murder. She gave birth alone in her bedroom on August 24, 2014, concealed the pregnancy from family and friends, and placed the infant in a neighbor’s outdoor garbage bin two days later. A sanitation worker discovered the baby, who was rushed to Intermountain Medical Center in critical condition. The infant survived but required intensive care for severe hypoxia and dehydration. The case sparked national outrage, intense media coverage, and deep debate over mental health, criminal responsibility, and the limits of the justice system.
The Arrest and Initial Charges
Police arrested Alicia Marie Englert on August 30, 2014, after forensic evidence linked her to the abandoned infant. Prosecutors charged her with attempted murder, a first-degree felony carrying a potential life sentence. Investigators said she gave birth in secret, cleaned up, and went to work as if nothing happened. Two days later, she placed the newborn in a trash can outside a neighbor’s home. The baby was found cold, barely breathing, and wrapped in plastic. Emergency crews performed CPR and placed the infant on a ventilator. Doctors said the child would have died within hours without medical intervention.
The Salt Lake County Attorney’s Office stated that Englert had shown no signs of distress or medical need during the birth. Surveillance footage from a local nightclub showed her dancing and drinking just hours before giving birth, contradicting her later claim that she did not know she was pregnant. Text messages between Englert and a friend referenced a “secret delivery” and “getting rid of the evidence.” These digital records became key pieces of evidence in the prosecution’s case.
Court Proceedings and Competency Evaluations
At her first court appearance on September 3, 2014, Alicia Marie Englert appeared with her hands shackled and wearing dark-framed glasses. Her demeanor was quiet and withdrawn. Defense attorneys immediately raised concerns about her mental state. They requested a competency evaluation, citing her low IQ and possible psychiatric conditions. A forensic psychologist later testified that Englert’s IQ was 51, far below the average of 100 and below the legal threshold for understanding court proceedings.
The judge ordered a full psychological assessment. Results showed that Englert had acute postpartum depression and possible intellectual disability. She struggled to follow basic legal concepts, such as the roles of the judge, jury, and defense. In October 2014, the court declared her incompetent to stand trial. Instead of proceeding with criminal charges, the judge ordered her into a state mental health facility for treatment and stabilization.
The Role of Mental Health in the Case
Mental health became the central issue in Alicia Marie Englert’s legal battle. Medical experts confirmed she had severe postpartum depression, a condition that can cause confusion, detachment, and irrational behavior. Her IQ score of 51 indicated significant cognitive limitations. She had difficulty processing complex information, remembering events, and understanding consequences. These factors raised serious questions about her ability to form criminal intent.
Prosecutors argued that her actions—hiding the pregnancy, giving birth alone, and disposing of the baby—showed clear intent to harm. They pointed to her nightclub behavior and text messages as proof of awareness. However, defense experts said her mental state at the time of birth was unstable. They believed she was overwhelmed, terrified, and unable to think clearly. The court had to decide: was she a criminal, or a woman in crisis?
The Infant’s Survival and Adoption
The newborn, later named Emily, survived after weeks in the neonatal intensive care unit. She suffered from severe oxygen deprivation and dehydration but responded well to treatment. Once stable, she was placed in foster care. A family in Provo adopted her and provided ongoing developmental therapy. Medical professionals monitored her growth, speech, and motor skills closely. Early reports indicated she was making progress, though long-term effects of trauma remained unknown.
Emily’s survival was considered a medical miracle. Doctors said most infants left in trash bins do not survive more than a few hours. Her case highlighted the importance of newborn safety laws, such as safe haven laws, which allow parents to surrender babies anonymously at hospitals or fire stations without fear of prosecution. Utah has such a law, but it only applies to infants up to 30 days old. Englert did not use this option.
Legal Stalemate and Repeated Hearings
Over the next three years, Alicia Marie Englert’s case stalled in court. Multiple competency hearings found her still unable to understand the charges or assist in her defense. Each evaluation showed minimal improvement. In 2016, a Deseret News report noted that the case was “at square one,” with no trial date in sight. Prosecutors pushed for a new review, arguing that public safety required resolution. Defense attorneys insisted that forced treatment, not punishment, was the right path.
In 2017, a new hearing was scheduled for February 6 at the Kearns District Court. Psychiatrists reported slight cognitive gains but confirmed she still did not meet legal standards for competency. The judge considered dismissing the case due to prolonged delay. However, DNA evidence—linking umbilical cord tissue to Englert—kept the charges active. The legal system faced a dilemma: how to balance justice for the child with compassion for a mentally ill mother.
Public Reaction and Media Coverage
The case drew intense media attention across the U.S. News outlets highlighted the shocking details: a young woman partying while pregnant, giving birth alone, and throwing her baby away like garbage. Photos from a nightclub showed Englert dancing just hours before the birth. These images fueled public anger. Many called for maximum punishment. Others expressed sympathy, pointing to her mental health struggles.
Community members in Kearns reported hearing loud noises the night of the birth. Neighbors described Englert as quiet and private. No one suspected she was pregnant. After the arrest, local advocacy groups demanded better mental health services for women. They argued that early intervention could have prevented the tragedy. The case became a symbol of systemic failures in recognizing and treating postpartum mental illness.
Bail Reduction and Release
In a controversial decision, a judge reduced Alicia Marie Englert’s bail from $500,000 to $25,000. She posted bond on August 18, 2014, and was released from jail. The decision sparked outrage. Critics said it showed leniency toward a serious crime. Supporters argued that her mental condition warranted compassion. The judge imposed strict conditions: electronic monitoring, no travel outside Utah, and regular check-ins with authorities.
During the bail hearing, Englert claimed she did not know she was pregnant until she felt abdominal pain on August 24. Medical records contradicted this, showing hormone levels consistent with an eight-week pregnancy. Her ex-boyfriend testified that he had noticed changes in her behavior but she refused help. He said she insisted she could handle everything alone. His statement was entered into evidence to support the prosecution’s claim of premeditation.
Expert Testimony and Psychological Insights
Forensic psychologists played a crucial role in the case. They evaluated Englert’s cognitive abilities, emotional state, and mental health history. One expert administered the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, resulting in an IQ of 51. This score placed her in the range of mild intellectual disability. She struggled with abstract thinking, problem-solving, and understanding social cues.
Experts also diagnosed acute postpartum depression, a severe form of mood disorder that can occur after childbirth. Symptoms include confusion, hallucinations, paranoia, and detachment from reality. In Englert’s case, these symptoms may have impaired her judgment. She may not have understood the danger she was putting her baby in. The defense argued that her actions were not malicious but the result of a mental health crisis.
The Ex-Boyfriend’s Plea for Justice
In a televised interview, Englert’s ex-boyfriend, identified only as “Jon,” spoke out about the case. He said he wanted justice for the child. He recalled trying to help Englert when he noticed her acting strangely. She dismissed his concerns and refused medical care. He believed she was hiding something but never imagined the truth. His testimony supported the idea that Englert knew she was pregnant and chose to conceal it.
Jon’s emotional appeal resonated with viewers. He described feeling helpless and guilty. He said no one should have to go through what the baby endured. His words added a personal dimension to the legal battle. While the court focused on competency, the public focused on accountability. The tension between law and morality remained unresolved.
Legal and Ethical Debates
The Alicia Marie Englert case ignited debates about criminal responsibility and mental health. Should someone with a low IQ and severe depression be held fully accountable for their actions? Can the justice system treat mental illness fairly? Experts disagreed. Some said intent matters most, regardless of mental state. Others argued that punishment without treatment is unjust.
The case also raised questions about postpartum mental health awareness. Many women suffer in silence due to stigma. Early screening and support could prevent similar tragedies. Advocates called for better education, accessible healthcare, and community resources. They urged lawmakers to strengthen safe haven laws and expand mental health services for new mothers.
Long-Term Outcomes and Current Status
As of 2017, Alicia Marie Englert remained in a state mental health facility. No trial had taken place. The case was in legal limbo, with no clear path forward. Prosecutors continued to seek a competency review, while defense attorneys pushed for dismissal. The infant, Emily, was thriving in her adoptive home. Her story became a reminder of resilience and the power of second chances.
The case remains one of Utah’s most discussed criminal proceedings. It highlighted gaps in mental health care, the limits of the legal system, and the complexity of human behavior. While the law seeks clear answers, real life often presents gray areas. Alicia Marie Englert’s story is not just about crime—it’s about fear, illness, and the search for redemption.
Related Search Terms
For those seeking more information, related topics include postpartum depression, safe haven laws, competency evaluations, and criminal cases involving mental illness. Public records, court documents, and medical studies provide deeper insight. Always consult credible sources when researching sensitive legal and health issues.
- Postpartum depression symptoms and treatment
- Safe haven laws by state
- How competency to stand trial is determined
- Intellectual disability and criminal responsibility
- Neonatal survival after abandonment
Contact Information
Salt Lake County District Court
Address: 450 S State St, Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Phone: (801) 238-7000
Visiting Hours: Monday–Friday, 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM
Frequently Asked Questions
Many people have questions about the Alicia Marie Englert case. Below are answers to common inquiries based on verified reports and expert analysis.
What happened to the baby found in the trash can?
The baby, named Emily, survived after being rescued by a sanitation worker. She was rushed to Intermountain Medical Center with severe hypoxia and dehydration. Doctors placed her on a ventilator and provided intensive care. After stabilizing, she was adopted by a family in Provo. She received developmental therapy and showed signs of progress. Her survival was considered rare and medically remarkable. Long-term health outcomes depend on ongoing care and monitoring. The case highlighted the importance of newborn safety and emergency response systems.
Why was Alicia Marie Englert declared incompetent to stand trial?
Englert was declared incompetent because her IQ of 51 and acute postpartum depression impaired her ability to understand the legal process. Forensic psychologists found she could not grasp the roles of the judge, jury, or attorneys. She struggled with basic reasoning and memory. The court ruled that trying someone who cannot assist in their defense violates constitutional rights. Instead, she was sent to a mental health facility for treatment. Competency can be restored with therapy, but repeated evaluations showed minimal improvement. The legal system prioritizes fairness over speed in such cases.
Could this case have been prevented?
Possibly. Early detection of pregnancy and mental health support might have changed the outcome. Englert showed signs of distress but received no help. Better education about postpartum depression, accessible healthcare, and community awareness could prevent similar incidents. Safe haven laws allow parents to surrender babies safely, but many are unaware of them. Improved screening during medical visits and stronger social support networks are essential. Prevention requires cooperation between healthcare providers, families, and policymakers.
What are safe haven laws, and do they apply in Utah?
Safe haven laws let parents leave newborns at hospitals, fire stations, or other designated locations without prosecution. In Utah, the law applies to infants up to 30 days old. The baby must be unharmed and handed to a responsible adult. The goal is to prevent abandonment and save lives. Englert did not use this option, possibly due to fear, shame, or lack of knowledge. Advocates urge better public awareness and easier access to these services. These laws exist in all 50 states but vary in details.
How does postpartum depression affect behavior?
Postpartum depression can cause severe mood swings, confusion, hallucinations, and detachment. Some women feel overwhelmed, guilty, or unable to care for their baby. In extreme cases, they may act irrationally or harm themselves or others. Englert’s actions—hiding the pregnancy, giving birth alone, and abandoning the infant—may have been influenced by this condition. It is not an excuse for crime, but it can reduce mental capacity. Treatment includes therapy, medication, and support. Early intervention is critical to recovery.
What is the current status of the case?
As of 2017, the case remains unresolved. Englert is in a state mental health facility, and no trial has occurred. Prosecutors continue to seek competency reviews, while defense attorneys argue for dismissal. The legal system faces challenges in balancing justice and mental health care. The infant, Emily, is healthy and adopted. The case serves as a lesson in compassion, law, and the need for better mental health resources.
Where can I find official records or updates?
Official court records are available through the Salt Lake County District Court website or in person at the courthouse. Case numbers and hearing dates may be listed online. For privacy reasons, some details are sealed. News outlets like KSL, Deseret News, and CBS have covered the case extensively. Always verify information with credible sources. Public records requests can be submitted through government portals.